search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / APRIL 2018


209


TABLE 2: Distribution of scores of equine squamous gastric disease according to sex, age, and breed in donkeys examined alive by gastroscopic examination. Results show the number of positive animals/number of examined animals, prevalence values, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (in brackets) for each score


Sex


Scores 0


1 2 3 4 Female 7/16


43.7% (19.4–68.1)


5/16


31.2% (8.5–54.0)


3/16


18.7% (0.0–37.9)


1/16


6.2% (0.0–18.1)


0/16


0.0% (0.0–0.0)


Male 12/23


52.2% (31.8–73.0)


0/23


0.0% (0.0–0.0)


7/23


30.4% (11.6–49.2)


3/23


13.0% (0.0–26.8)


1/23


4.3% (0.0–12.7)


≤3 years 11/23


47.8% (27.4–68.2)


1/23


4.3% (0.0–12.7)


6/23


26.1% (8.1–44.0)


4/23


17.4% (1.9–32.8)


1/23


4.3% (0.0–12.7)


Age >3 years 8/16


50.0% (25.5–74.5)


4/16


25.0% (3.8–46.2)


4/16


25.0% (3.8–46.2)


0/16


0.0% (0.0–0.0)


0/16


0.0% (0.0–0.0)


Amiatina 18/33


54.5% (37.8–70.6)


1/33


3.0% (0.33–13.3)


9/33


27.3% (14.4–43.9)


4/33


12.2% (4.2–26.3)


1/33


3.0% (0.33–13.3)


Breed


Crossbreed 1/6


16.7% (1.9–55.8)


4/6


66.6% (28.6–92.3)


1/6


16.7% (1.9–55.8)


0/6


0.0% (0.0–0.0)


0/6


0.0% (0.0–0.0)


Total


19/39 48.7% (33.0–64.4)


5/39* 12.8% (2.3–23.3)


10/39† 25.6% (11.9–39.5)


4/39† 10.3% (0.7–19.8)


1/39† 2.6% (0.0–7.5)


*,† Difference between the prevalence of donkeys affected by grade 1 lesions (hyperaemia and/or hyperparakeratosis), and the prevalence of donkeys affected by grade 2–4 lesions (ulcers) was statistically significant (12.8% [2.3–23.3%] vs. 38.5% [23.2–53.7%], P = 0.0183).


reported in Spain (Morales Brice~ no et al. 2015) and in the UK


(Morrow et al. 2011), respectively. Differences in prevalence rates of G. intestinalis may be due to environmental and climatic conditions influencing the spread of parasites. Some geographical areas may therefore be more favourable than others for the transmission of equine gastric myasis. It is also possible that lower prevalences were associated with the use of drugs that are effective against gastric stages of G. intestinalis. Unfortunately, other researchers did not provide information in this regard in their studies (Morrow et al. 2011; Morales Brice~


no et al. 2015). The role of parasites in the


pathogenesis of gastric lesions is unclear. Previous reports have suggested that Gasterophilus spp. can cause gastric and intestinal ulceration (Sandin et al. 2000; Sequeira et al. 2001). Since larvae were found both in donkeys with and without EGUS, the authors cannot rule out whether infestation by G. intestinalis could be a risk factor for EGUS in this host species. The starch/grain intake has been associated with a higher


risk of EGUS, both in horses (Vatistas et al. 1999; Frank et al. 2005; Luthersson et al. 2009) and donkeys (Burden et al. 2009). All the donkeys included in the present study were fed on carbohydrates in the same manner; therefore, this risk factor could not be evaluated.


Conclusions


Equine gastric ulcer syndrome has been described in horses and donkeys. In this study, we report EGUS in a population of donkeys in Italy. Our results highlight that EGUS had high prevalence in the examined donkey population although there were no clinical signs and that the squamous portion of the stomach was much more frequently affected than the glandular region. This suggests that EGUS may be more common in donkeys than was previously thought, but it is routinely overlooked. Further studies are needed to investigate the aetiology, pathogenesis, clinical significance and risk factors for this condition in donkeys.


Authors’ declaration of interests No conflicts of interest have been declared.


Ethical animal research


The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Pisa (prot. N. 9069/2014).


Source of funding This research has been supported by funding from the University of Pisa.


Authorship


M. Sgorbini and F. Bonelli contributed to study design, study execution, data analysis and interpretation, and preparation of the manuscript. R. Papini contributed to data analysis and interpretation, and preparation of the manuscript. S. Busechian contributed to study execution, data analysis and interpretation, and preparation of the manuscript. A. Briganti contributed to study design and study execution. F. Laus, V. Faillace and F. Zappulla contributed to study execution. A. Rizk contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. F. Rueca contributed to study execution and data analysis and interpretation. All authors gave their final approval of themanuscript.


Manufacturers' addresses


1Molitoria Val di Serchio, Lucca, Italy. 2Zoetis Italia srl, Rome, Italy. 3ACME s.r.l., Cavriago, Italy. 4Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany. 5GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA.


References


Al-Mokaddem, A.K., Ahmed, K.A. and Doghaim, R.E. (2014) Pathology of gastric lesions in donkeys: a preliminary study. Equine Vet. J. 47, 684-688.


© 2017 EVJ Ltd


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80