search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / AUGUST 2020


435


a)


b)


Fig 3: a) Laparoscopic view of the ductus deferens crossing the suspensory ligament of the bladder (arrow). b) The tail of the epididymis within the abdomen – this is significant because the tail of the epididymis descends before the testis.


* E


Fig 4: Horse 4: This spermatic tissue was removed via unilateral standing laparoscopy. A large normal epididymis (E) in the region of the deep inguinal ring but no testicle was evident. Further gross examination of the resected tissue showed an oval nubbin of beige tissue around 5 3 5 3 8 mm in the position a testicle should have been relative to the epididymis (*). This tissue was not sent for histopathology.


normal scrotal testicle (Mason et al. 2005). However, a reduction in surgical site infections has been shown when combining a laparoscopic and conventional castration technique to remove the descended testis in abdominal cryptorchids (Rijkenhuizen and van der Harst 2017). Three different hormonal assays were used in this study,


most commonly the hCG stimulation test. Historically both hCG stimulation tests and measurement of serum oestrone sulphate concentrations have been shown to be accurate (Cox et al. 1986) but there is more recent evidence to suggest preferred testing for functional testicular tissue in cryptorchids by measuring serum anti-M€


ullerian hormone (Ball


et al. 2008; Claes et al. 2013; Parker 2016). An accurate diagnosis is important because of the behavioural differences between geldings and horses with functional testicular tissue. Hormone assays would have confirmed either the presence or absence of residual testicular tissue in the four horses for which results were not available. It has been stated that a diagnosis of monorchidism can


only be made after surgical exploration, removal of the normal testis and hormonal testing (Searle et al. 1999). The


Fig 5: Horse 1: Spermatic tissue resected for histopathology. The presumed atrophic testis is marked with the arrow. Histopathology confirmed complete absence of testicular tissue.


retrospective collection of data for our study meant that it was not possible to follow the inclusion criteria set out by Searle et al. (1999) as post-operative hormone testing had not always been performed. The diagnosis in these horses was based primarily on surgical findings, but with additional information provided by inguinal percutaneous ultrasound, which has been shown to be an accurate diagnostic tool for locating inguinal cryptorchid testes (Coomer et al. 2016). Identifying the three spermatic tissue attachments (Parks et al. 1989), as well as an absence of testicular tissue at surgery supported the diagnosis of monorchidism. In conclusion, systematic exploratory surgery requires


good knowledge of anatomy to ensure that monorchidism is identified. Understanding the possible variations in appearance of the associated spermatic structures in monorchid horses is clinically useful particularly during surgery when a testicle cannot be found. Laparoscopy assists with the easy identification of the spermatic structures and the absence of testicle enabling a prompt diagnosis at surgery whilst hormonal assays and histopathology are useful post-operatively to confirm the complete absence of testicular tissue. Histopathology may also provide additional evidence for implicating ischaemic injury as the cause of acquired monorchidism in horses and may allow us to more accurately differentiate between true monorchids and anomalous abdominal cryptorchids.


© 2019 EVJ Ltd


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92