search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
432


EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION


Equine vet. Educ. (2019) 31 (8) 432-440 doi: 10.1111/eve.12757


Review Article


Local anaesthetic techniques for the equine head, towards guided techniques and new applications H. Hermans†*


, S. Veraa‡, C. F. Wolschrijn§ and J. P. A. M. van Loon†


†Department of Equine Sciences, ‡Division of Diagnostic Imaging, §Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. *Corresponding author email: h.hermans@uu.nl


Keywords: horse; anaesthetic; head; perineural nerve blocks; ultrasound


Summary Perineural nerve blocks are often used in equine practice, especially since the use of diagnostic and surgical procedures in the standing sedated horse have expanded over recent decades. The purpose of this review is to discuss the different perineural nerve blocks for the equine head. The review starts with the currently most used blind approaches as described in textbooks and scientific studies. In human medicine, the role of guided techniques, such as ultrasound guidance, advanced imaging guidance and nerve stimulator guided techniques, is very extensively described. These techniques are promising to use in equine medicine as well. The first studies that describe these techniques in equine cases are also discussed in this review, as well as the possibilities for neuromodulation in equine pain syndromes like equine trigeminus-mediated headshaking and the role of perineural nerve blocks in diagnosing this syndrome.


Introduction


In modern equine veterinary practice, surgical and diagnostic procedures in the standing sedated horse are expanding, especially with the growing interest in minimally invasive surgery (Dixon et al. 2005; Coomer et al. 2011; De Linde Henriksen and Brooks 2014; Menzies and Easley 2014). Reliable and stable sedative planes are very important and various studies have been performed to assess the effects of sedative and analgesic pharmaca (Ringer et al. 2013; Marly et al. 2014). Both in the sedated horse and in the horse under general anaesthesia, the beneficial effects of locoregional techniques (diminished levels of sedation or anaesthesia, prevention of harmful reflexes and pre-emptive analgesic effects) are clearly described (Ong et al. 2005; Oel et al. 2014). Furthermore, in the standing equine patient it is especially important to provide a reliable local anaesthetic block regarding the safety of the horse, the veterinary surgeon and animal handlers. Previous reviews have very extensively described the use


and anatomical landmarks for all relevant local anaesthetic techniques for the equine head (Tremaine 2007; Labelle and Clark-Price 2013). Experience of the performer is very important in the success rates of local anaesthetic techniques, as was shown by Wilmink et al. (2015) for the perineural block of the maxillary nerve. Although blind techniques used to be the gold standard, nowadays ultrasound-guided techniques are quickly being adopted. They are broadly used in human medicine where there has been a rapid development in different ultrasound-guided


© 2017 EVJ Ltd


approaches in recent years (Helayel et al. 2007). Ultrasound-guided local anaesthetic techniques enhance both the quality and duration of peripheral-nerve blockade and reduce the incidence of complications. Meta-analyses comparing ultrasound-guided local anaesthetic techniques to blind techniques in man have shown that ultrasound guidance reduces complication rates and improves quality of the block (both for sensory and motor blocks); the technique further reduces performance time and results in quicker onset of the block in peripheral nerve blockade in adult humans (Walker et al. 2009; Lewis et al. 2015). Furthermore, ultrasound guidance reduces the incidence of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (neuro- and cardiotoxicity consequent to unintended intravascular injection or delayed tissue uptake; El-Boghdadly and Chin 2016; Neal 2016) and unintended paresthesias (Soeding et al. 2005). For infants, a recent systematic review by Guay et al. (2016) showed that ultrasound guidance improved the success rate and duration of perioperative neuraxial and peripheral local blocks. Additional data are required to assess the potential effect of ultrasound guidance on reducing the rate of inadvertent puncture of blood vessels. Besides these advantages, ultrasound guidance was found to improve the learning curve of clinicians and it has been stated that the technique should have a role in future training (Marhofer et al. 2005). To date, the role of ultrasound-guided techniques and advanced imaging is still limited in the performance of local nerve blocks in the equine patient. This review discusses the perineural nerve blocks for the


equine head and describes blind approaches as well as those guided by ultrasound, nerve stimulation, or advanced imaging techniques and compares human and equine literature. As perineural techniques can also have diagnostic and therapeutic value, the possibilities for neuromodulation in equine pain syndromes such as equine trigeminus-mediated headshaking and the role of perineural nerve blocks in diagnosing this syndrome are also discussed.


Perineural nerve blocks for the equine head: classic approach


The most commonly used local anaesthetic techniques for the equine head are well described in various review articles (Tremaine 2007; Labelle and Clark-Price 2013) and veterinary textbooks (Easley et al. 2011; Gilger 2011). Perineural nerve blocks are often used in equine dentistry and equine ophthalmology. Figure 1 shows the four anatomical locations for the techniques most often used in equine dentistry: the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88