search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
84


EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION


Equine vet. Educ. (2022) 34 (2) 84-95 doi: 10.1111/eve.13395


Original Article


Gait abnormalities and ridden horse behaviour in a convenience sample of the United Kingdom ridden sports horse and leisure horse population


S. Dyson†* , J. Routh‡ , A. Bondi§ and D. Pollard¶


†The Cottage, Market Weston, Diss; ‡Centre for Equine Studies, Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk; §Firbeck House, Worksop, Derbyshire; and ¶Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance Department, Centre for Preventive Medicine, Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK *Corresponding author email: sue.dyson@aol.com


J. Routh’s present address: University of Surrey School of Veterinary Medicine Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7AL, UK D. Pollard’s present address: 28 Stable Close Colchester, Essex, CO3 0UG, UK


Keywords: horse; saddle; noseband; lameness; musculoskeletal pain; Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram


Summary The objectives of this study were to compare horses’ gaits in


hand and when ridden; to assess static and dynamic saddle fit for each horse and rider; to apply the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram (RHpE) and relate the findings to gait abnormalities consistent with musculoskeletal pain, rider position and balance and saddle fit; and to document noseband use and its relationship with mouth opening during ridden exercise. Data were acquired prospectively from a convenience sample of horses believed by their owners to be working comfortably. All assessments were subjective. Gait in hand and when ridden were evaluated independently, by two assessors, and compared using McNemar’s test. Static tack fit and noseband type were recorded. Movement of the saddle during ridden exercise, rider position, balance and size relative to the saddle was documented. RHpE scores were based on assessment of video recordings. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was used to determine factors which influenced the RHpE scores. Of 148 horses, 28.4% were lame in hand, whereas 62.2% were lame ridden (P<0.001). Sixty per cent of horses showed gait abnormalities in canter. The median RHpE score was 8/24 (interquartile range 5, 9; range 0, 15). There was a positive association between lameness and the RHpE score (P<0.001). Riding School horses had higher RHpE scores compared with General Purpose horses (P = 0.001). Saddles with tight tree points (P = 0.001) and riders seated at the back of the saddle rather than the middle (P = 0.001) were associated with higher RHpE scores. Horses wearing crank cavesson compared with cavesson nosebands had higher RHpE scores (P = 0.006). There was no difference in mouth opening, as defined by the RHpE, in horses with a noseband with the potential to restrict mouth opening, compared with a correctly fitted cavesson noseband, or no noseband. It was concluded that lameness or gait abnormalities in canter may be missed unless horses are assessed ridden.


Introduction


It is well recognised that a horse’s gait may appear different when ridden compared with in hand (Licka et al. 2004;


© 2020 EVJ Ltd Marqu es et al. 2014; Dyson and Greve 2016), but there has


been no large-scale comparative study. It is becoming increasingly evident that there is a lack of recognition of lameness and other pain-related gait alterations by riders and trainers in the sports horse population, with variable estimates of 47–69% of horses experiencing musculoskeletal pain (Greve and Dyson 2014; Marqu


es et al. 2014; Dyson and Greve 2016;


Pfau et al. 2016; Rhodin et al. 2016; Wilson et al. 2016; Dittmann et al. 2020). A Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram (RHpE) has been developed to help identify horses with musculoskeletal pain (Dyson et al. 2018a). Further evaluation of a broad cross section of sports horses would potentially help to demonstrate the usefulness of this tool. The prevalence of ill-fitting saddles was reported, and the importance of correct saddle fit for equine musculoskeletal health was highlighted by Greve and Dyson (2014, 2015a); however, this was restricted to saddle fit for the horse and not the rider. Correct saddle fit for the rider is considered important both for optimal force distribution and enabling the rider to ride in balance (Dyson et al. 2019; Bondi et al. 2020; Roost et al. 2020). There has been considerable debate about the use, design and fit of nosebands, the possible discomfort imposed by nosebands and the relationship between mouth opening and nosebands (Fenner et al. 2016; Doherty et al. 2017; Uldahl and Clayton 2019). However, there has been no large-scale study relating noseband use to oral behaviour. The objectives of this study were to compare horses’ gaits


in hand and when ridden; to assess static and dynamic saddle fit for each horse and each rider; to apply the RHpE and relate the findings to gait abnormalities consistent with


musculoskeletal pain, rider position and balance and saddle fit; and to document noseband use and its relationship with mouth opening during ridden exercise.


Materials and methods


Study population This was a cross-sectional study, performed at 10 venues. Data were collected prospectively from a convenience sample of horses, recruited from professional and amateur


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84