search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
484


EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / SEPTEMBER 2017


Case Report Lipoma of the long digital extensor tendon sheath in a horse


C. Owens†, A. Young‡, P. Loukopoulos† and B. Hilbert†* †Veterinary Clinical Centre and Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia; and ‡University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia. *Corresponding author email: bhilbert@csu.edu.au


Keywords: horse; lipoma; tendon sheath; weanling


Summary This paper describes the occurrence of a lipoma associated with the long digital extensor tendon sheath at the level of the tarsus in a 5-month-old female Thoroughbred. Radiographic and ultrasonographic images were interpreted as being an atypically located lipoma. Its position and character have some similarities to lipoma arborescens, which is reported to occur in and around human joints and tendon sheaths. Surgical removal is considered to be the treatment of choice.


Introduction


Pedunculated mesenteric lipomas occur in the abdomen of older horses, and are usually only detected at post mortem examinations or when they cause a strangulating intestinal obstruction (Edwards and Proudman 1994; Freeman and Schaeffer 2001; Garcia-Seco et al. 2005). In 2002, Hammer et al. described a lipoma in a 2-year-old Quarter Horse that had arisen from the sheath of the common digital extensor tendon at the level of the carpus. The tumour was thought to be associated with a traumatic injury that the gelding sustained one year earlier. Histologically, the mass consisted of vascularised adipose tissue and collagen bundles but was otherwise unremarkable. While there have been sporadic reports of lipomas occurring externally in horses, they have not been typically associated with the synovial lining of tendon sheaths or joints (Blackwell 1972; Bristol and Fubini 1984; Baker and Kreeger 1987; Anderson and King 1988; Lepage et al. 1993; Hamir et al. 1994; Carson Dunkerley et al. 1997).


This report describes the putative, spontaneous


occurrence of an intrathecal lipoma of the long digital extensor tendon sheath in a Thoroughbred filly.


Case history


A 5-month-old female Thoroughbred was presented for assessment of a firm, soft tissue mass on the dorsal aspect of the right tarsus (Fig 1). The filly was not lame and there did not appear to be any restriction of joint motion. The swelling had been present for approximately 4 months and had slowly grown in size to 7 9 10 cm. There was a granulating wound over the dorsal and medial aspect of the swelling which was related to a previous biopsy attempt in the field. The swelling had previously been injected with corticosteroids but remained unchanged. Fluid could not be aspirated from the swelling and there was no associated effusion of the tarsocrural joint.


© 2015 EVJ Ltd Imaging


Radiographic examination of the right tarsus revealed a large, approximately 9 cm long mass dorsal to the tarsocrural joint and trochlear ridges of the talus (Fig 2). The mass was of mixed fat and soft tissue opacity. The lesser opacity of the fat enabled visualisation of a thin dorsal soft tissue capsule and multiple, irregular but subtle soft tissue opacities coursing throughout the centre of the mass. A small (2 cm long) soft tissue defect was seen at the distal dorsomedial margin of the mass, consistent with the location of the granulating external wound from the previous biopsy. There was no radiographic evidence of tarsocrural effusion and the mass did not communicate with the joint on a positive contrast arthrogram study. Linear soft tissue opacities consistent with at least one of the extensor tendons could be seen passing distally into the central region of the mass. The adjacent osseous structures were unremarkable. The mass was ultrasonographically heterogeneous and


had a thin, well-defined hyperechoic capsular margin dorsally (Fig 3). The deeper margins of the mass were less distinct. The adjacent long and lateral digital extensor tendons were unremarkable despite their close proximity to


the mass. There was at least one small pocket of echogenic fluid within the mass. Differential diagnoses at this stage included an atypically located lipoma, granuloma or organising haematoma. The former was thought to be most likely given the mixed fat/soft tissue opacity on the radiographic study.


Surgical findings


With the horse anaesthetised and positioned in dorsal recumbency and with the affected limb suspended in extension, a 15 cm curvilinear skin incision was made over the dorsal aspect of the swelling. An encapsulated mass (Fig 4) was exposed using a combination of sharp and blunt dissection. The tumour was intimately associated with the synovial lining of the sheath of the long digital extensor tendon and this made it difficult to define the anatomic limits of the tendon sheath accurately. An incision into the tumour revealed a white fat-like tissue mass that seemed to have its origins within the tendon sheath (Figs 5 and 6). The tumour was isolated using blunt dissection and careful efforts were made to ensure as much abnormal tissue as possible was removed. A defect that was created in the tendon sheath was repaired using USP 2/0 poly-p-diaxanone (MonoPlus)1 placed in a horizontal mattress pattern. The subcutaneous tissues were apposed and dead space eliminated by placing


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88