search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / july 2022


339


regression analysis carried out to identify associations between horse and management-level variables and the risk of uveitis. Each case was then followed longitudinally to determine the rate of recurrence of uveitis. In total, 23 cases and 46 controls were recruited. Being


close to a pig farm (OR 27.8; CI 1.31–592.06) and a recent history of flooding of the pasture (OR 15.43; CI 2.80–84.98) were associated with increased risk of uveitis. Being in the same owner’s possession for a longer amount of time had a protective effect (OR 0.79; CI 0.68–0.93). Horses recovered uneventfully following treatment and showed no evidence of recurrence in 59.1% of the cases (n = 13). In five horses (22.7%), the initial episode of uveitis could not be controlled and required surgical therapy. Recurrence was observed in four horses (18.2%). These results indicate that the proportion of cases that experience recurrence is low in the UK.


Equine ulcerative keratitis


This study by Eline Vercruysse and co-workers in Belgium aimed to describe bacterial isolates and associated antibiotic resistance from horses with ulcerative keratitis. Medical records from horses with ulcerative keratitis


presented to a teaching hospital in Belgium over an 8-year period were evaluated. Bacterial isolates were identified, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and resistance detection were performed using an automated system. Samples from 200 eyes of 196 horses were evaluated; 97


eyes had a positive bacterial culture (48.5%), and 139 bacterial isolates were identified. Staphylococcus (63/139: 45.3%) and Streptococcus (33/139: 23.7%) were the most frequent genus isolated. Staphylococcus aureus (21/139: 15.1%) was the most frequent species isolated of which half were methicillin-resistant (MRS). Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (19/139: 13.7%) was the second most identified bacterial isolate. Only two Pseudomonas species were isolated (2/139: 1.4%). The overall resistance of all


bacterial isolates against chloramphenicol (12.4%) and fluoroquinolones (14.3%) was low. Resistance against tobramycin, polymyxin B, gentamicin, fusidic acid, tetracycline and neomycin ranged from 40.8% to 58.6%. When separating the MRS from the other staphylococci, a significant difference was noted in percentage of resistance to gentamicin and tetracycline. MRS were highly resistant to gentamicin (75%) and tetracycline (100%), whereas the remaining staphylococci were significantly less resistant to gentamicin (17%) and tetracycline (40.4%). Although Pseudomonas species has been rarely cultured,


these results are roughly consistent with previous studies. Multiple drug resistance was high, and resistance to first- choice antibiotics in ulcerative keratitis was noted. These results warrant continued monitoring of susceptibility profile.


Faecal PCR testing


This study by Gary Magdesian and co-workers at the University of California-Davis, USA, evaluated faecal PCR testing for detection of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridioides difficile toxin genes and other pathogens in 28 foals with diarrhoea. This study evaluated the results of a comprehensive


faecal diarrhoea PCR panel in 28 foals that had been presented to a referral hospital because of diarrhoea. Sixteen (57%) foals were positive for C. perfringens and/or C. difficile toxin gene sequences on faecal PCR, including three foals positive for NetF toxin. These foals were younger and had higher haematocrits, haemoglobin and red blood cell concentrations than foals with diarrhoea that tested negative for clostridial toxins. The foals had lower total protein concentrations and were more likely to have band neutrophils on a CBC (OR: 16.2). All three foals with NetF toxin gene sequences detected


in faeces survived to discharge, indicating that diarrhoea caused by NetF toxigenic C. perfringens isolates is not uniformly fatal.


S. WRIGHT EVE Editorial Office References


Hall, S., Smith, R., Ramzan, P.H.L., Robinson, N. & Parker, R. (2022) Rib fractures in adult horses as a cause of poor performance; diagnosis, treatment and outcome in 73 horses. Equine Veterinary Journal. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13566


Magdesian, K.G., Barnham, S. & Pusterla, N. (2022) Fecal PCR testing for detection of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridioides difficile toxin genes and other pathogens in foals with diarrhea: 28 cases. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 34, 396–401.


Malalana, F., Ireland, J.L., Pinchbeck, G.L. & McGowan, C.M. (2022) Risk factors for a first episode of primary uveitis in the UK and proportion of cases that experience recurrence following this first episode. Equine Veterinary Journal. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13576


Mita, H., Tamura, N., Fukuda, K., Kuroda, T., Kuwano, A. & Sato, F. (2022) Incidence of carpal fractures and risk factors for recurrent fractures after arthroscopic removal of carpal chip fracture fragments in Thoroughbred racehorses. Veterinary Record Epub ahead of print; doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1482


Vercruysse, E.M., Narinx, F.R., Rives, A.C.M., Sauvage, A.C., Grauwels, M.F. & Monclin, S.J. (2022) Equine ulcerative keratitis in Belgium: Associated bacterial isolates and in vitro antimicrobial resistance in 200 eyes. Veterinary Ophthalmology Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12985


Vernemmen, I., Van Steenkiste, G., Dufourni, A., Decloedt, A. & van


Loon, G. (2022) Transvenous electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in horses: Horse and procedural factors correlated with success and recurrence. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 36 (2), 758–769. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16395


© 2022 EVJ Ltd


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88