search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / july 2022


375


a)


b)


c)


d)


Fig 4: a) Spooking. b) Rearing, intense stare. c) Front of head ≥30° in front of vertical position in left canter; ears back, tail swishing. d) Front of head slightly behind vertical position but <10°, therefore does not fulfil RHpE criteria; mouth open with separation of the teeth. Croup high in left canter.


by their owners to be working comfortably (Dyson and Pollard 2020). The horses comprised Riding School horses, those used for General Purposes (including unaffiliated competition), Show Jumping, Eventing and Dressage, and performed the same purpose-designed dressage test. The RHpE was applied retrospectively to video recordings acquired in a standardised fashion. Overall, 73% of horses were lame (≤grade 2/8) on one or more limbs and 47% had gait abnormalities in canter. Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram scores ranged from 3–16/24 (median 9). The effect of breed, sex, horse age, work-discipline, epaxial muscle hypertonicity or pain (assessed by an equine physiotherapist), an ill-fitting saddle (evaluated by a Society of Master Saddlers Qualified Saddle Fitter), rider skill score (determined by a British Horse Society Instructor), and the presence of lameness or gait abnormalities in canter (assessed by an experienced equine clinician) on the RHpE score was assessed using Poisson regression. Two variables were retained in the final multivariable analysis, lameness (P = 0.008) and rider skill score as a continuous variable (P<0.001). A RHpE score ≥8/24 was again a good indicator of the presence of musculoskeletal pain.


In an additional study comprising a convenience sample


of sports and leisure horses, gait in hand and when ridden were evaluated independently, by two veterinarians, and compared (Dyson et al. 2022a). Movement of the saddle during ridden exercise and rider position, balance and size relative to the saddle were documented by a British Horse Society Instructor. Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram scores were determined by a skilled assessor based on evaluation of video recordings. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was used to determine factors which influenced the RHpE scores. Of 148 horses, 28% were lame in hand, whereas 62% were lame ridden. Sixty percent of horses showed gait abnormalities in canter. The median RHpE score was 8/24 (interquartile range 5, 9; range 0, 15). There was a significant positive association between lameness and the RHpE score. Riding School horses had higher RHpE scores compared with General Purpose horses. Saddles with tight tree points and riders seated at the back of the saddle rather than the middle were significantly associated with higher RHpE scores. Overall, gait and RHpE data from 491 horses have been assessed and documented. These comprised non-lame


© 2021 EVJ Ltd


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88