384
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / july 2022
Scenario Red blood cells and virus a) Sample is seronegative b)
Red blood cells, virus and antibodies
Haemagglutination inhibition
Interaction
Haemagglutination Result
Sample is seropositive AA B B B
AA A
B
B
Fig 3: Haemagglutination inhibition assay; a) the covered red wells indicate haemagglutination (lattice of agglutinated cells), so there are no antibodies to the virus at those sample serum dilutions to neutralise the virus. b) red dot wells indicate no haemagglutination, so the test is positive at the specified dilution (the highest last dilution at which haemagglutination is prevented).
Disadvantages of CFT
• Anti-complimentary activity can interfere with the test, resulting in false-positive results
• Nonspecific due to cross-reactivity between EHV-1 and EHV-4
Indirect fluorescence antibody test
Fig 4: Serum radial haemolysis; top row, first two wells on left = negative samples, next four wells = positive samples. Middle row = empty wells. Bottom row, first three wells on left = mild positives, fourth well = empty, last two wells = positive controls.
whether the serum itself still fixes complement and prevents red cell lysis, mimicking what would happen if there were viral-specific antibodies present in the sera. If the serum demonstrates anti-complimentary activity, this must be considered when interpreting test results as they may be falsely elevated. CFT is used to test sample for the presence of equine herpes virus-1/-4 (EHV-1/-4) antibodies and this phenomenon of anti-complementary activity can be found in donkeys and occasionally in very sick horses (T.A. Hammond, personal communication).
Advantages of CFT
• A useful test for EHV-1/-4 as CF antibodies are not long lasting, even after vaccination
© 2021 EVJ Ltd
Indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) involves sample serum being added to virus infected cells. If antibody is present in the sample, it binds with a specific antigen on the tissue. Fluorochrome-labelled secondary antibody conjugate is added, which binds to the already present antigen– antibody complex and releases fluorescence, seen on microscopy (Fig. 6). If there are no antibodies in the sample serum, there will be no fluorescence.
Advantages of IFAT
• Commonly used as a confirmatory test, for example samples being tested for Dourine that are CF positive will be confirmed by IFAT
Disadvantages of IFAT
• Test requires a longer time compared to other tests, for example CF and ELISA
• More expensive Virus neutralisation test
When virus is mixed with susceptible cells, it will infect them and when visualised under a microscope, a cytopathic
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88