EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / MAY 2015
277
Critically Appraised Topic Can septic pedal osteitis be managed in the standing patient?
E. Cillán-García The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, Edinburgh, UK. Corresponding author email:
eugenio.cillian@
ed.ac.uk
Introduction
Infection of the hoof is probably the most common cause of lameness in horses. The clinical signs of a hoof infection are variable and septic pedal osteitis can be a potential sequelae of penetrating wounds, subsolar abscesses and laminitis (Gaughan et al. 1989). The cause of infection is normally one or more of the many ubiquitous bacteria living on the hoof or in the horse’s environment. Affected horses normally have a history of chronic lameness with drainage of purulent exudate from the foot that often resolves and recurs at a later time. Radiographic examination often will reveal decreased bone density, demineralisation and irregularity of the bone margins at the level of the infected bone (Cauvin and Munroe 1998). Treatment requires a combination of surgical debridement of the infected bone and surrounding tissues in addition to systemic and local antimicrobial therapy. The surgical debridement of the infected bone is normally carried out in the standing sedated horse under regional anaesthesia with the application of a tourniquet to control haemorrhage. However, in horses with a difficult temperament, general anaesthesia is indicated. The sole or hoof wall can be approached initially with hook knifes and motorised instruments to gain access to and allow curettage of the lesion. After the infected tissues are removed the defect is lavaged, topical antibiotics and sterile bandages are applied. Systemic antibiotic administration is continued until a healthy bed of granulation tissue has covered the pedal bone. At this point, application of a hospital plate is indicated to reduce the amount of bandaging materials and reduce the pressure on the surgical site.
Search method
The terms ‘septic pedal osteitis’ or ‘distal phalanx infection’ were used to search PubMed. Hand searching of references in all the articles identified provided the initial database of literature.
Quantity of evidence Zero RCT, 4 retrospective studies.
Quality of evidence
Articles were considered relevant if the researched terms ‘septic pedal osteitits’ were present in the title, abstract or body of the article. Only retrospective studies that were relatively small in size were identified. There were 3 studies focusing on septic pedal osteitis and one of these considered only foals (Neil et al. 2007). The fourth retrospective study,
assessing solar penetrations (Kilcoyne et al. 2011), was included as a subgroup of these cases developed septic pedal osteitis.
Clinical implications
Cauvin and Munroe (1998) reported the surgical treatment of septic pedal osteitis in 18 horses, in 17 horses the procedure was carried out under general anaesthesia. Furthermore, they reported that under general anaesthesia the surgical debridement and haemorrhagic control was easily achieved. Recent publications in the literature demonstrated a
tendency for a standing surgical approach for the treatment of septic pedal osteitis. They proposed several reasons why the standing approach is better compared with general anaesthesia. In addition to avoiding the cost and risk of general anaesthesia, homeostasis, exposure of the affected tissues, radiographic surgical guidance are considered easier in the standing patient. Either a solar or hoof wall approach can be achieved in the standing patient.
Conclusions
The management of septic pedal osteitis in the standing patient with the use of regional anaesthesia and the application of a tourniquet is based on weak evidence if the hierarchical evidence based medicine pyramid is considered. Yet there are several recent review articles that suggest the standing approach of septic pedal osteitis is possible and may be advantageous for several reasons. Future studies should aim to address large randomised clinical trials comparing outcomes in the standing patient treated for septic pedal osteítis compared to outcomes of those treated when general anaesthesia is used. Outcome measures should include length of time to return to work and frequency of recurrence.
Author’s declaration of interests No conflicts of interests have been declared.
References
Cauvin, E.R. and Munroe, G.A. (1998) Septic osteitis of the distal phalanx: findings and surgical treatment in 18 cases. Equine Vet. J. 30, 512-519.
Gaughan, E.M., Rendano, V.T. and Ducharme, N.G. (1989) Surgical treatment of septic pedal osteitis in horses: nine cases (1980-1987). J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 195, 1131-1134.
Kilcoyne, I., Dechant, J.E., Kass, P.H. and Spier, S.J. (2011) Penetrating injuries to the frog (cuneus ungulae) and collateral sulci of the foot in equids: 63 cases (1998-2008). J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 239, 1104-1109.
Neil, K.M., Axon, J.E., Todhunter, P.G., Adams, P.L., Caron, J.P. and Adkins, A.R. (2007) Septic osteitis of the distal phalanx in foals: 22 cases (1995-2002). J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 230, 1683-1690.
© 2015 EVJ Ltd
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
