LABORATORY DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND HOW TO INTERPRET THEM For concentration-dependent antimicrobials, such
as the aminoglycosides amikacin or gentamicin, the maximum serum concentration to MIC (Cmax/MIC) or the area under the curve to MIC (AUC/MIC) ratios should be evaluated, where Cmax is the max- imal achievable plasma concentration and AUC is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. These values are obtained from pharmaco- kinetic studies of that antimicrobial in the target species. The Cmax/MIC ratio for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, both concentration-dependent drug classes, should be 8–10 in order to ensure maximal efficacy. For example, if the MIC of gen- tamicin for an E. coli isolate is 2 g/mL, then the peak concentration of gentamicin measured at 1 hour post-administration after appropriate dosing (e.g., 6.6–8.8 mg/kg IV, daily) must be 16–20g/mL for it to have maximal efficacy, largely based on data from human medicine.4–6 In evaluating the phar- macokinetics (PK) in horses, it is found that the expected 1-hour peaks with such dosing are indeed about 20 g/mL. Therefore, in this case, gentami- cin would be considered effective, and the isolate would be considered “S” to gentamicin. Fortu- nately, therapeutic drug monitoring is feasible and practical for the aminoglycosides. A 1 hour post- administration peak would be measured in the se- rum of the patient and compared to the MIC. The AUC/MIC for enrofloxacin ideally should be 100– 125 for optimal efficacy, and like the Cmax data, these ratios can be obtained from publications eval- uating the PK of enrofloxacin in horses. The interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility
testing is determined by two major international bodies, the CLSI for the United States, and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibil- ity Testing (EUCAST). The EUCAST has estab- lished breakpoints for human pathogens, whereas the CLSI has separate recommendations for both human and veterinary bacterial agents in a variety of animals. Results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in-
clude susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R).
Interpretation of Results from the Laboratory
Susceptible A microbe is defined as susceptible (S) when it is inhibited by a concentration of antimicrobial that is readily achievable in serum after safe dosing of that drug in the targeted animal species, in this case horses. The antimicrobial would be predicted to have a high likelihood of therapeutic success.2,3
Intermediate
A microbe is defined as intermediate (I) in suscepti- bility when it is inhibited by antimicrobial concen- trations that may ormay not be achievable in serum after recommended dosing in horses. Therefore the therapeutic effect is less predictable, and only if the
infection is in a site where the drug is concentrated (e.g., intracellular) or when a higher dose of the drug can be administered safely. Hence, an antimicro- bial deemed “I” in susceptibility would be less desir- able for the tested microbe than one with an “S” designation.
Resistant
Resistance to an antimicrobial means the concentra- tion of antimicrobial required for inhibition of growth is higher than achievable serum concentra- tions after recommended dosing protocols in horses.2,3 The bacterial isolate being tested would not be inhibited by the usual achievable concentra- tions of the antimicrobial after normal dosing and intervals recommended for horses. In this case there is a high likelihood of therapeutic failure if that antimicrobial is used. From the example used above for “S”, if the MIC of the microbe for gentami- cin is 8g/mL, then it would be considered resistant because a Cmax of 64–80 g/mL is not readily achieved after safe dosing in most horses.7 In a study evaluating daily doses of 6.6 mg/kg IV of gen- tamicin administered daily to adult horses, 1-hour peak concentrations of gentamicin ranged from 4.4 to 42.6 g/mL, with a median value of 21.4 g/mL.7
4. Discussion
Culture and susceptibility testing results are useful for maximizing therapeutic efficacy while being mindful of antibiotic stewardship. Though there is a time delay of 3–5 days for results, they can ensure that the early, empirical antibiotic choice that was made was an appropriate one. If it was not, then an antibiotic change is in order, using data from the susceptibility results. The other advantage of per- forming culture and susceptibility testing routinely in a practice is that over time it will provide the clinician with data from which he or she can predict an effective antimicrobial for the specific type of bacteria. For example, if cultures from horses with cellulitis commonly result in growth of staphylo- cocci, the clinician can accumulate susceptibility data over a few year period and use that information to predict which antimicrobials would have the high- est probability of success for treating a staphylococ- cal cellulitis even before susceptibility results are available, or when a positive culture is not obtained. For example, if the previous 10 or 20 cultured Staph- ylococcus isolates were found to be susceptible to gentamicin, then gentamicin in combination with a beta-lactam antimicrobial for synergy and broad- spectrum coverage would be an appropriate prelim- inary antibiotic combination for cellulitis cases going forward. It is important to note that MIC results should be interpreted in light of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for the specific antimicrobial in horses whenever available, especially when equine-specific CLSI guidelines are not available. Some of the equine-suggested CLSI susceptibility
AAEP PROCEEDINGS Vol. 65 2019 239
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276 |
Page 277 |
Page 278 |
Page 279 |
Page 280 |
Page 281 |
Page 282 |
Page 283 |
Page 284 |
Page 285 |
Page 286 |
Page 287 |
Page 288 |
Page 289 |
Page 290 |
Page 291 |
Page 292 |
Page 293 |
Page 294 |
Page 295 |
Page 296 |
Page 297 |
Page 298 |
Page 299 |
Page 300 |
Page 301 |
Page 302 |
Page 303 |
Page 304 |
Page 305 |
Page 306 |
Page 307 |
Page 308 |
Page 309 |
Page 310 |
Page 311 |
Page 312 |
Page 313 |
Page 314 |
Page 315 |
Page 316 |
Page 317 |
Page 318 |
Page 319 |
Page 320 |
Page 321 |
Page 322 |
Page 323 |
Page 324 |
Page 325 |
Page 326 |
Page 327 |
Page 328 |
Page 329 |
Page 330 |
Page 331 |
Page 332 |
Page 333 |
Page 334 |
Page 335 |
Page 336 |
Page 337 |
Page 338 |
Page 339 |
Page 340 |
Page 341 |
Page 342 |
Page 343 |
Page 344 |
Page 345 |
Page 346 |
Page 347 |
Page 348 |
Page 349 |
Page 350 |
Page 351 |
Page 352 |
Page 353 |
Page 354 |
Page 355 |
Page 356 |
Page 357 |
Page 358 |
Page 359 |
Page 360 |
Page 361 |
Page 362 |
Page 363 |
Page 364 |
Page 365 |
Page 366 |
Page 367 |
Page 368 |
Page 369 |
Page 370 |
Page 371 |
Page 372 |
Page 373 |
Page 374 |
Page 375 |
Page 376 |
Page 377 |
Page 378 |
Page 379 |
Page 380 |
Page 381 |
Page 382 |
Page 383 |
Page 384 |
Page 385 |
Page 386 |
Page 387 |
Page 388 |
Page 389 |
Page 390 |
Page 391 |
Page 392 |
Page 393 |
Page 394 |
Page 395 |
Page 396 |
Page 397 |
Page 398 |
Page 399 |
Page 400 |
Page 401 |
Page 402 |
Page 403 |
Page 404 |
Page 405 |
Page 406 |
Page 407 |
Page 408 |
Page 409 |
Page 410 |
Page 411 |
Page 412 |
Page 413 |
Page 414 |
Page 415 |
Page 416 |
Page 417 |
Page 418 |
Page 419 |
Page 420 |
Page 421 |
Page 422 |
Page 423 |
Page 424 |
Page 425 |
Page 426 |
Page 427 |
Page 428 |
Page 429 |
Page 430 |
Page 431 |
Page 432 |
Page 433 |
Page 434 |
Page 435 |
Page 436 |
Page 437 |
Page 438 |
Page 439 |
Page 440 |
Page 441 |
Page 442 |
Page 443 |
Page 444 |
Page 445 |
Page 446 |
Page 447 |
Page 448 |
Page 449 |
Page 450 |
Page 451 |
Page 452 |
Page 453 |
Page 454 |
Page 455 |
Page 456 |
Page 457 |
Page 458 |
Page 459 |
Page 460 |
Page 461 |
Page 462 |
Page 463 |
Page 464 |
Page 465 |
Page 466 |
Page 467 |
Page 468 |
Page 469 |
Page 470 |
Page 471 |
Page 472 |
Page 473 |
Page 474 |
Page 475 |
Page 476 |
Page 477 |
Page 478 |
Page 479 |
Page 480 |
Page 481 |
Page 482 |
Page 483 |
Page 484 |
Page 485 |
Page 486 |
Page 487 |
Page 488 |
Page 489 |
Page 490 |
Page 491 |
Page 492 |
Page 493 |
Page 494 |
Page 495 |
Page 496 |
Page 497 |
Page 498 |
Page 499 |
Page 500 |
Page 501 |
Page 502 |
Page 503 |
Page 504 |
Page 505 |
Page 506 |
Page 507 |
Page 508 |
Page 509 |
Page 510 |
Page 511 |
Page 512 |
Page 513 |
Page 514 |
Page 515 |
Page 516 |
Page 517 |
Page 518 |
Page 519 |
Page 520 |
Page 521 |
Page 522 |
Page 523 |
Page 524 |
Page 525 |
Page 526 |
Page 527 |
Page 528 |
Page 529 |
Page 530 |
Page 531 |
Page 532 |
Page 533 |
Page 534 |
Page 535 |
Page 536 |
Page 537 |
Page 538 |
Page 539 |
Page 540 |
Page 541 |
Page 542 |
Page 543 |
Page 544 |
Page 545 |
Page 546 |
Page 547 |
Page 548 |
Page 549 |
Page 550 |
Page 551 |
Page 552 |
Page 553 |
Page 554 |
Page 555 |
Page 556 |
Page 557 |
Page 558 |
Page 559 |
Page 560 |
Page 561 |
Page 562 |
Page 563 |
Page 564 |
Page 565 |
Page 566 |
Page 567 |
Page 568 |
Page 569 |
Page 570 |
Page 571 |
Page 572 |
Page 573 |
Page 574 |
Page 575 |
Page 576