228


EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION


Equine vet. Educ. (2019) 31 (5) 228-229 doi: 10.1111/eve.12957


Editorial


Welfare concerns for the US sport horse – A matter of practice ethics?


Sport horses in the USA are, without question, some of the best cared for horses in the world. Owners, trainers and riders most often want the very best care possible for their horses regardless of the level of competition, yet lack of education and the desire to win on the part of owners and trainers may blur the line between proper care and abusive practices. Many sport organisations in the USA have somewhat liberal medication rules and even those organised competitions which are strict about treatments (i.e. FEI) may suffer from inadequate stewarding. We, as veterinarians, are ethically obligated to meet the medical needs of the horse and to recommend best practices for their continued health and well-being. When surveyed by this author, most veterinarians caring for


sport horses involved in US competitions of eventing, show jumping, dressage, show hunters and western performance readily cited areas of concern regarding equine welfare. It was often expressed that the equine veterinary profession had created some of the problems that now exist. Some were quite defensive in their tone, citing all the good attributes of their sport while blaming any equine welfare concerns on the lack of good horsemanship of owners and trainers. Are owners and trainers solely to blame? The sport horse industry in the USA has evolved into a multi-


billion-dollar industry with thousands of competitions each year. Horses have become significantly more expensive to acquire and maintain, and there is pressure for these animals to train, compete and win. This is often translated to pressure on the equine practitioner to perform questionable treatments or give advice on practices which may be considered illegal or unethical. The veterinarian is in a unique position to help the horse and minimise abusive practices through educating the client and delivering services which are truly good for the horse but doing so sometimes takes bravery. Colleagues expressed concern for equine welfare related


to various aspects of sport horse practice in the USA. There was a consistent concern about overuse of medication in the performance horse. Allied with this were concerns related to medication use with no diagnosis or for the purpose of affecting behaviour. Sport horse practitioners are becoming increasingly aware of the need for better training programmes that condition the horse against injury, yet there is a constant struggle with educating the clients to employ these practices. Often, the treating veterinarian is faced with limited finances which the client prefers to dedicate to the ‘quick fix’ as opposed to extensive diagnostics and rehabilitation. To quote Dr. Kent Allen ‘Absent a diagnosis, medicine is poison, surgery is trauma, and alternative therapy is witchcraft’. That said, we may not always be functioning in the best interest of the horse. To promote equine welfare and level the playing field for


competition, the United States Equestrian Federation and the American Quarter Horse Association have promulgated rules regarding medication use and prohibited practices.


© 2018 EVJ Ltd


Medication and treatment rules have been based on ‘reasonable therapeutic use’ grounded in the concept that a minor health issue, such as a wound, minor infection or mild soreness, may not be a threat to the welfare of the competing horse when appropriately treated. As a result, a list of medications has evolved that includes some that are not prohibited, and some which are listed as restricted and levels are regulated. There is an extensive list of forbidden medications which include drugs such as psychotropic agents, sedatives, anaesthetics, antihistamines and corticosteroids other than dexamethasone (USEF, 2018). Injectable medications may be administered by the horseman or veterinarian, but no horse is to be injected with any substance within 12 h of competition by anyone other than a veterinarian (a USEF provision only). A 6-h rule was established by USEF and applies only to fluids, antibiotics and a reduced dose of dexamethasone administered by a veterinarian. Any forbidden medication administered must be for a legitimate therapeutic purpose, withdrawn for 24 h prior to competition, and declared in a medication report. This rule, while arguably liberal, gives the horseman a considerable bit of latitude while addressing realistic health and welfare concerns for the horse in competition. Unfortunately, these rules have allowed for significant


abuse in the sport horse world governed by these organisations, not to mention unrecognised shows. Trainers are often making the decisions regarding what medications horses in their care receive and advice of what to use often comes from other trainers rather than the veterinarian. There are multiple ‘urban myths’ relative to currently allowed and unrestricted medications that may lead to their excessive use in an effort to enhance performance. This is a form of abuse not to mention technically illegal. Often, when veterinarians are asked, they are passive in their advice for fear of alienating the trainer and losing a client. Thus, inappropriate drug use may continue. We have to look at ourselves in the mirror for our past acts


of encouraging treatments and joint injections to improve performance. Some of these practices were based on sound medical decisions, some because of client pressure, and some, unfortunately, for our own personal economic gain. Many trainers now expect ‘maintenance injections’ simply because nothing has been done to the horse in a while. Such treatments should, from an ethical standpoint, be based on a thorough clinical examination and determined need for such therapy. Surely, some horses that are working hard need periodic therapy for the treatment of inflamed joints or other musculoskeletal issues. Educating the client to do periodic evaluations which may preclude the need for such aggressive therapy is in the best interests of the horse. The veterinarian can be in the driver’s seat by being ‘proactive’ and recommending modifications of shoeing, feeding, general health care (that may include medication) and training practices that may minimise the need for subsequent


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84