508
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / OCTOBER 2014
topical phenylephrine (Phenylephrine HCl 1%)12, dimethyl sulfoxide gel (DMSO)9, and triamcinolone acetonide cream (Triamcinolone acetonide cream 0.1%)13 were applied twice to the periocular region to reduce periocular inflammation.
Further clinical findings, diagnostics and treatment
On the morning of Day 3, the horse became acutely neurological and depressed. Abnormal clinical findings included leaning against the stall wall on his right side, head pressing and intermittent episodes of seizure-like activity characterised by rapid spastic movements of the left hindlimb. These episodes were preceded by periods of marked tachypnoea that resolved following the activity. Attempts to guide the horse away from the wall were unsuccessful, although he was able to ambulate using the wall for support. He was able to eat, but unable to locate feed placed in front of him, typically moving to the left of the food. Prehension, mastication and deglutition were otherwise normal. A complete blood count revealed a marked leucocytosis (22.3 ¥ 109 cells/l, reference range [rr] 5.0–11.0 ¥ 109 cells/l) consisting of a neutrophilia (21.2 ¥ 109 cells/l, rr 2.1–6.7 ¥ 109 cells/l) with a left shift (0.45 ¥ 109 cells/l band neutrophils, rr 0.0–0.20 ¥ 109 cells/l) and a moderate lymphopenia (0.22 ¥ 109 cells/l, rr 1.3–4.5 ¥ 109 cells/l). Hyperfibrinogenaemia (8 g/L, rr 1–4 g/l) and mild anaemia (packed cell volume 28.3%, rr 34–45%; erythrocytes 6.19 ¥ 1012 cells/l, rr 7.0–11.0 ¥ 1012 cells/l) were present. Serum chemistry panel was unremarkable. Radiographs (right lateral and right oblique) of the more caudal aspect of the skull revealed no evidence of fracture within the guttural pouches, basisphenoid bone or temporohyoid regions. The horse was able to move freely away from the wall by evening, but only moved to the left. Dysphagia was noted that evening when the horse prehended hay and made no attempts at mastication, keeping the jaw clamped. Periocular swelling remained unchanged since the previous day and the tarsorrhaphy was removed at this time in the event that increased pressure on the globe was exacerbating neurological signs. A 2 cm round mass was noted for the first time on the floor of the right naris, but was considered an incidental finding at that time. Menace response and pupillary light reflex (PLR) were present in the right eye. At this time, neurological evaluation was suggestive of diffuse forebrain disease with primary differentials including bacterial meningitis, trauma, equine protozoal myeloencephalitis secondary to stress and glucocorticoid administration, or viral encephalitis. Due to high suspicion of bacterial meningitis, antimicrobial therapy consisting of ceftiofur sodium (Naxcel3 4 mg/kg bwt i.v. b.i.d.) was initiated. On Day 4, the horse was placed under general anaesthesia and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected from the atlanto-occipital site; a sub-palpebral lavage system was also placed to facilitate ocular treatments. Computed tomography of the skull was recommended to further evaluate for skull fractures and to assess the nasal mass, but was declined by the owner. The CSF was xanthochromic and revealed a high nucleated cell count (5.38 ¥ 109 white blood cells/l, rr<0.005 ¥ 109 white blood cells/l), elevated total protein (2.75 g/l, rr 0.32–0.48 g/l) and an elevated red blood cell count (2.2 ¥ 107 erythrocytes/l). Cytology revealed a neutrophilic pleocytosis (99% neutrophils, primarily nondegenerate to slightly degenerate, and 1% lymphocytes) and a small number of neutrophils containing intracellular
© 2013 EVJ Ltd
Fig 1: Cytology of cerebrospinal fluid. Modified Wright’s stain, 100 ¥ magnification. Numerous nondegenerate to mildly degenerate neutrophils. Arrowheads show a nondegenerate neutrophil containing intracellular bacterial rods and cocci. Image courtesy of Dr H. Flaherty, Department of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
bacterial rods and cocci (Fig 1). Based on the neutrophilic pleocytosis and presence of bacteria within the CSF, a diagnosis of bacterial meningitis was established, and samples were submitted for anaerobic and aerobic bacterial culture. Gentamicin (GentaVed 1002 6.6 mg/kg bwt i.v. s.i.d.) was added to antimicrobial therapy following the identification of Gram-negative rods on CSF cytology. Despite the cytological evidence of polymicrobial infection, culture results of the CSF indicated a low pure growth of Escherichia coli that was susceptible to ceftiofur, gentamicin and enrofloxacin. A combination of ceftiofur and gentamicin were utilised as broad spectrum coverage until Day 11. A complete ophthalmic examination revealed multiple superficial ulcers in the cornea along with marked chemosis and a tear in the ventral palpebral conjunctiva. Topical ocular treatments in the left eye were changed to solutions of atropine (Atropine sulfate ophthalmic solution)8 used to effect and Neomycin Polymyxin B Gramicidin (Neo-Poly-Gramicidin ophthalmic solution)8 q.i.d. The mass in the right nostril had increased in size to approximately 3 cm, and a fine needle aspirate yielded a small quantity of serous fluid containing scant neutrophils. The horse remained quiet but responsive on Day 5, and
displayed propulsive circling to the right overnight. The horse was interested in food, but had difficulty prehending. The right nasal mass progressed to approximately 4 cm in size, and remained firm but did not appear hot or painful. Ultrasonographic examination of the mass via the rostral nasal passage revealed a honeycomb appearance, but no flocculent material was appreciated. Topical application of ichthammol (Ichthammol ointment)10 and application of hot compresses was instituted twice daily on the nasal mass. Right-sided facial hyperaesthesia, ptosis, ear droop and a head tilt developed in addition to muzzle deviation to the left, and an incomplete blink reflex was present. These findings were consistent with dysfunction of cranial nerves V, VII and VIII on the right side. The horse remained relatively stable on Days 6 and 7, but continued to have difficulty prehending food and masticating. He began moving to the left, and the circling decreased.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84