search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / OCTOBER 2014


551


compressive lesions appear as a circumferential loss of contrast agent (Moore et al. 1992). In our patient, only CT detected the lesions present at the level of C2, which were defined by post mortem examination. This finding demonstrates the high sensitivity ofCTforbonelesions.However, the lesions described at the level of C4 were not noticed. Reducing the slice thickness could increase the sensitivity of the examination. Computed tomographic myelography yields the most sensitive evaluation and qualitative information regarding the source, severity and location of spinal cord compression (Moore et al. 1992). Nevertheless, CT is an expensive technique, not widely available that requires general anaesthesia. However, standing CT of the head and neck of the sedated horse is possible in a few facilities (Nelson 2008). Gantry size limits the investigation of the cervical region toC4–C5;however, usingalargeboreC6canbeincluded in the examination. In this case the patient was already anaesthetised for the myelogram and C3 fitted perfectly in the gantry. A previous report of CT myelography of the cervical region


of the horse dealt with cervical stenotic myelopathy. Myelography and CT myelography were highly sensitive to detect spinal cordcompression, but CT myelographywasmore accurate in the demonstration of the source, severity and location of this compression (Moore et al. 1992). The general osteolyticappearanceof C3, with compression


of the spinal cord could have been caused by an infectious or neoplastic process. Theabsenceof cervical painandanyother sign of an infectious process in our patient suggested a neoplastic process to be more likely. Previous studies reported that antemortemdiagnosis ofahaemangiosarcomais difficult. In a study by Southwood et al. (2000) only 4 of the 35 patients withadisseminatedhaemangiosarcomawerediagnosedante mortem. Ante mortem diagnosis is possible only when a mass is readily recognisable and accessible for biopsy (Johns et al. 2005). CT-guided biopsy would have been an option for diagnosis in this case. Treatment of haemangiosarcoma is generally unrewarding


in all species. Reported treatments involve surgical excision, radiation and chemotherapy. In most cases treatment is considered more palliative than curative and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used (Southwood et al. 2000). Osseous haemangiosarcoma should be included in the


differential diagnosis of compressive lesions in the vertebral canal. Computed tomographic myelography can give additional information on the extent and exact location of these lesion and this information can be useful for prognosis, biopsy and/or surgery.


Authors’ declaration of interests No conflicts of interest have been declared.


Manufacturers’ addresses


1Magstim 200 Whitland, UK. 2General Electric Co. Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. 3GE Prospeed, General Electric Co., Medical Systems, Milwaukee,


Wisconsin, USA. 4SuperFrost Plus, Menzel-Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany. 5Dakocytomation, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark.


References


Frye, F.L., Knight, H.D. and Brown, S.I. (1983) Hemangiosarcoma in a horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 182, 287-289.


Hargis, A.M. and McElwain, T.F. (1984) Vascular neoplasia in the skin of horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 184, 1121-11224.


Johns, I., Stephen, J.O., Del Piero, F., Richardson, D.W. and Wilkins, P.A. (2005) Hemangiosarcoma in 11 young horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 19, 564-570.


Johnson, J.E., Beech, J. and Saik, J.E. (1988) Disseminated hemangiosarcoma in a horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 194, 1429-1431.


Kennedy, F.A. and Brown, C.M. (1993) Vertebral angiosarcoma in a horse. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 5, 125-127.


MacGillivray, K.C., Sweeney, C.R., McLear, R. and Habecker, P. (2003) Vertebral body hemangiosarcoma in a 16-year-old miniature Sicilian donkey. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 44, 429-432.


Moore, B.R., Holbrook, T.C., Stefanacci, J.D., Reed, S.M., Tate, L.P. and Menard, M.C. (1992) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and myelography in six horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy. Equine Vet. J. 24, 197-202.


Nelson, A. (2008) Computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses. In: Proceedings of the 47th British Equine Veterinary Association Conference, Equine Veterinary Journal Ltd., Newmarket. p 153.


Newton-Clarke, M.J., Guffroy, M.R.G., Dykes, N.L. and Divers, T.J. (1994) Ataxia due to a vertebral hemangiosarcoma in a horse. Vet. Rec. 135, 182-184.


Southwood, L.L., Schott, H.C., Henry, C.J., Kennedy, F.A., Hines, M.T., Geor, R.J. and Hassel, D.M. (2000) Disseminated hemangiosarcoma in the horse: 35 cases. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 14, 105-109.


Sweeney, C.R. and Gilletee, D.M. (1989) Thoracic neoplasia in equids 35 cases (1967-1987). J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 195, 374-377.


Tucker, R.L. and Gavin, P.R. (2002) The equine vertebral column. In: Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology, 4th edn., Ed: D.E. Thrall, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. pp 127-133.


Valentine, S.I., Ross, C.E., Bump, J.L. and Eng, V.M. (1986) Intramuscular hemangiosarcoma with pulmonary metastasis in a horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 188, 628.


Van Pelt, R.W., Langham, R.F. and Gill, H.E. (1972) Multiple hemangiosarcomas in the tarsal synovial sheath of a horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 161, 49.


Von Reinachter, M. (1978) Hemangioendotheliome in der skelettmuskulatur eines pferdes. Berl. Münch. Tierärtztl. Wochenschr. 91, 121-123.


Waugh, S.I., Long, G.G., Uriah, L. and Grant, B.D. (1977) Metastatic hemangiosarcoma in the equine: report of 2 cases. J. Equine Med. Surg. 1, 311-315.


© 2012 EVJ Ltd


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84