search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
582


EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION


Equine vet. Educ. (2022) 34 (11) 582 doi: 10.1111/eve.13539_1


Original Article


Use of venography including the dorsal 60° proximal- palmaro-/plantaro-distal oblique to improve the evaluation of nonlaminitic digital disease of the horse


K. Trolinger-Meadows†, A. Morton†,*, T. McCarrel†, E. Porter‡ and V. Dryden§


†Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences; ‡Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida; and §Bur Oak Veterinary and Podiatry Services, Lexington, Kentucky, USA *Corresponding author email: mortona@ufl.edu


Keywords: horse; keratoma; osteitis; abscess; venography


Summary Background Many common nonlaminitic conditions of the equine digit can be diagnosed radiographically, although vascular disturbance cannot be evaluated without use of contrast venography. Digital venography is commonly used to assess vascular disturbance in horses with laminitis. Routine venography projections include the lateromedial (LM) and dorsopalmar/dorsoplantar (DP) projections, although these do not provide complete assessment of the digital vasculature.


Objectives The purpose of this study was to describe digital venography as a diagnostic tool for nonlaminitic disease of the digit of horses including the dorsal 60° proximal-palmaro-/plantaro- distal oblique (60° DP) in addition to the standard LM and DP projections.


Study design Retrospective descriptive case series.


Methods Medical records were reviewed to identify patients with nonlaminitic disease that had digital venography including LM, DP and 60° DP projections. Horses free of disease of the digit were utilised for comparison. Images were reviewed, and presence or absence of radiographic and venographic abnormalities was determined individually.


Results


Venography revealed vascular abnormalities in horses with digital keratoma, complex digital abscessation, and simple


digital abscessation. The inclusion of the 60° DP projection allowed for better determination of location and extent of vascular disturbance of the distal phalanx.


Main limitations Limitations of the study include the small sample size and retrospective nature, as well as lack of literature describing vascular disturbances in nonlaminitic processes.


Conclusions Digital venography can be considered for evaluation of submural disease of the digit of horses. For more complete assessment of the distal phalangeal vasculature, the 60° DP projection should be included in all digital venographic studies.


Clinical relevance


• Digital venography with inclusion of the dorsal 60° proximal-palmaro-/plantaro-distal oblique projection provided important clinical information that was not provided by plain radiography and aided in selection of treatment and guidance on prognostication.


• Digital venography is an easily performed, readily available, affordable, stall side option to evaluate for the presence of vascular disturbances associated with nonlaminitic pathology.


• Digital venography may provide an economical manner to monitor disease progression and response to therapy in conditions affecting the distal phalanx.


Previous presentation or publication disclosure: This abstract was previously presented at the American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Special Session at the World Veterinary Rehabilitation Summit in Knoxville, TN on 31 July 31 2018 and at the American College of Veterinary Surgeons Surgical Summit in Phoenix, AZ on 25 October 2018. It was published in ACTA Veterinaria Scandanavia 2019, 61, (Suppl. 1), p.27-28.


© 2021 EVJ Ltd


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92