search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
590


NOVEMBER 2022


sensitivity is comparable between egg types. However, Wisconsin and McMaster were recently found to perform with very similar diagnostic sensitivities for detection of strongyle eggs (Cain et al., 2020), so it is possible that qualitative performance would also be similar for detection of ascarid eggs between these two techniques.


Take home messages


Based on the items covered herein, equine veterinarians making use of faecal egg counts should consider the following take-home points:


• Routine testing anthelmintic treatment efficacy is of paramount importance in equine veterinary practice of


today and should be the starting point for any parasite control program.


• In foals, weanlings and yearlings, faecal egg counts should be used to monitor presence of ascarid parasites


to allow selection of appropriate anthelmintics.


• In mature horses, strongylid faecal egg counts can be used to classify horses into low, moderate and high


shedders for a tailored parasite control approach targeting cyathostomin parasites.


• Faecal egg counts are neither indicative of worm burden size nor parasitic involvement in clinical disease.


• Themultiplication factor of a faecal egg counting technique is not synonymouswith its diagnostic or analytic sensitivity.


• Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity have limited implications for the performance of faecal egg counting techniques.


• Accuracy and precision are important quantitative performance parameters for faecal egg counting


techniques, but they are not synonymous.


• Precision has the largest implications for faecal egg counts given the estimation of anthelmintic efficacy and


classification of strongylid egg shedding status.


• Training and experience of personnel performing faecal egg counts affects test performance and needs attention.


• Automated faecal egg counting techniques perform with higher precision than manual techniques and will likely


become more widely used in the future. Author’s declaration of interests


The author holds stock in MEP Equine Solutions, LLC, which is commercialising an automated image-based parasite egg counting technology.


Ethical animal research Ethical review not applicable for this review article.


Source of funding This article was not financially supported.


References


Bolwell, C.F., Rosanowski, S.M., Scott, I., Sells, P.D. and Rogers, C.W. (2015) Questionnaire study on parasite control practices on Thoroughbred and Standardbred breeding farms in New Zealand. Veterinary Parasitology 209,62–69.


Cain, J.L., Peters, K.T., Suri, P., Roher, A., Rutledge, M.H. and Nielsen, M.K. (2021) The effect of analyst training on fecal egg counting variability. Parasitology Research 120, 1363–1370.


Cain, J.L., Slusarewicz, P., Rutledge, M.H., McVey, M.R., Wielgus, K.M., Zynda, H.M. et al. (2020) Diagnostic performance of McMaster, Wisconsin, and automated egg counting techniques for enumeration of equine strongyle eggs in fecal samples. Veterinary Parasitology 284, 109199.


Carstensen, H., Larsen, L., Ritz, C. and Nielsen, M.K. (2013) Daily variability of strongyle fecal egg counts in horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 33, 161–164.


Chapman, M.R., French, D.D., Taylor, H.W. and Klei, T.R. (2002) One season of pasture exposure fails to induce a protective resistance to cyathostomes but increases numbers of hypobiotic third-stage larvae. Journal of Parasitology 88, 678–683.


Cox, D.D. and Todd, A.C. (1962) Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 141, 706–709.


Cringoli, G., Maurelli, M.P., Levecke, B., Bosco, A., Vercruysse, J., Utzinger, J. et al. (2017) The Mini-FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of helminth and protozoan infections in human and animals. Nature Protocols 12, 1723–1732.


Cringoli, G., Rinaldi, L., Maurelli, M.P. and Utzinger, J. (2010) FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nature Protocols 5, 503–515.


Dobson, R.J., Hosking, B.C., Jacobson, C.L., Cotter, J.L., Besier, R.B., Stein, P.A. et al. (2012) Preserving new anthelmintics: a simple method for estimating faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) confidence limits when efficacy and/or nematode aggregation is high. Veterinary Parasitology 186,79–92.


Donoghue, E.M., Lyons, E.T., Bellaw, J.L. and Nielsen, M.K. (2015) Biphasic appearance of corticated and decorticated ascarid egg shedding in untreated horse foals. Veterinary Parasitology 214, 114–117.


Duncan, J.L. and Love, S. (1991) Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles. Equine Veterinary Journal 23, 226–228.


Elghryani, N., Crispell, J., Ebrahimi, R., Krivoruchko, M., Lobaskin, V., McOwan, T. et al. (2020) Preliminary evaluation of a novel, fully automated, Telenostic device for rapid field-diagnosis of cattle parasites. Parasitology 24,1–5.


Elghryani, N., Duggan, V., Relf, V. and de Waal, T. (2019) Questionnaire survey on helminth control practices in horse farms in Ireland. Parasitology 146, 873–882.


ESCCAP. (2019) A guide to the treatment and control of equine gastrointestinal parasite infections, 2nd edn. European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites. https://www.esccap.org/ uploads/docs/rtjqmu6t_0796_ESCCAP_Guideline_GL8_v7_1p.pdf


Fabiani, J.V., Lyons, E.T. and Nielsen, M.K. (2016) Dynamics of Parascaris and Strongylus spp. parasites in untreated juvenile horses. Veterinary Parasitology 230,62–66.


Gomez, H.H. and Georgi, J.R. (1991) Equine helminth infections: control by selective chemotherapy. Equine Veterinary Journal 23, 198–200.


Gordon, H.M. and Whitlock, H.V. (1939) A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research 12, 52.


Kaplan, R.M. and Nielsen, M.K. (2010) An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: it ain’t the 60s anymore. Equine Veterinary Education 22, 306–316.


Kjær, L.N., Lungholt, M.M., Nielsen, M.K., Olsen, S.N. and Maddox- Hyttel, C. (2007) Interpretation of serum antibody response to Anoplocephala perfoliata in relation to parasite burden and faecal egg count. Equine Veterinary Journal 39, 529–533.


Kotze, A.C. and Kopp, S.R. (2008) The potential impact of density dependent fecundity on the use of the faecal egg count reduction test for detecting drug resistance in human hookworms. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2, e297.


© 2021 EVJ Ltd.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92