search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Received: 18 September 2023 | Accepted: 8 November 2023 DOI: 10.1111/eve.13924


OR IG INA L A R T I C L E


Oral sugar test responses to ertugliflozin in ten horses with insulin dysregulation


Tania Sundra 1,2 | Gabriele Rossi 2 | Erin Kelty 3 | Guy Lester 4 | David Rendle 5


1 Avon Ridge Equine Veterinary Services , Brigadoon , Western Australia , Australia 2 School of Veterinary Medicine , Murdoch University , Murdoch , Western Australia , Australia 3 School of Population and Global Health , The University of Western Australia , Crawley , Western Australia , Australia 4 Equiimed , Perth , Western Australia , Australia 5 EMT Consulting , Tiverton, Devon , UK


Correspondence: Tania Sundra Email: info@avonridgeequine.com.au


Summary Background : Preliminary evidence indicates that ertugliflozin benefits horses and ponies (hereafter collectively referred to as horses) with hyperinsulinaemia and hyperinsulinae- mia-associated laminitis. The effects of ertugliflozin on the results of the oral sugar test used widely in the assessment of insulin dysregulation (ID), have not been reported. Objectives : To report the effects of ertugliflozin on responses to the oral sugar test (OST) in horses with ID. Study design : Retrospective case series. Methods : Clinical records were reviewed to identify horses with ID that had an OST (0.45 mL/kg Karo-Light PO) performed before and after 4 days of treatment with 0.05 mg/ kg ertugliflozin PO s.i.d. Pre- and post-treatment insulin concentrations were compared using Wilcoxon sign-ranked tests. Results : Ten horses with ID met the inclusion criteria. Significant reductions in plasma insulin concentration were identified at all time points after 4 days of treatment with ertugliflozin relative to pre-treatment values. At T0 (prior to oral sugar), median insulin concentration reduced from 22.4 μu/mL (IQR: 6.5, 39) pre-treatment to 4.8 μu/mL (IQR: 3.7, 9.2) at day 4 ( p = 0.004). At T60 (60 min after oral sugar), median insulin concentration was 165 μu/mL (IQR: 61.2, 222) pre-treatment and 78.1 μu/mL (IQR: 30.5, 137) at day 4 ( p = 0.004). At T90 (90 min after oral sugar), median insulin concentration was 170 μu/ mL (IQR: 88.6, 269) pre-treatment and 84.7 μu/mL (IQR: 28.7, 122) at day 4 ( p = 0.002). Serum triglyceride concentration increased from a median of 0.4 mmol/L (IQR: 0.2, 0.8) pre-treatment to 0.9 mmol/L (IQR: 0.6, 2) at day 4 of ertugliflozin treatment ( p = 0.006). Main limitations : A small heterogenous group of horses and ponies, some with PPID, were used in the absence of a control group. Conclusions : Four daily doses of ertugliflozin at 0.05 mg/kg was associated with lower- ing of insulin concentrations at baseline and in response to an OST in horses with ID; however, insulin levels did not return to normal in all horses. Increases in triglyceride concentrations were also observed.


K E YWORDS horse , endocrine , equine metabolic syndrome , laminitis , obesity , sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor


The study was performed at Avon Ridge Equine Veterinary Services.


This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2023 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Education published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.


Equine Vet Educ. 2024;36:317–324. aaep.org/wiley-redirect | 317

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88