search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Received: 30 September 2023 | Accepted: 6 December 2023 DOI: 10.1111/eve.13940


OR IG INA L A R T I C L E


Preliminary study to evaluate the use of fast abdominal ultrasonography of horses with colic in first opinion ambulatory practice


Sam Corrie 1 | Kristina Chapman 1


1 CVS Ltd, Equicall, Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic , Kent , UK 2 CVS Ltd, CVS House , Norfolk , UK 3 CVS Ltd, Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic , Kent , UK


Correspondence: Tim Mair Email: tim.mair@btinternet.com


| Imogen Schofield 2 | Tim S. Mair 3


Summary Background : Colic is the commonest emergency in first opinion equine practice. Early re- ferral is important for horses requiring surgery. Fast localised abdominal ultrasonography of horses (FLASH) is frequently used as a diagnostic tool in the investigation of colic at referral hospitals, but its use in first opinion practice has not been evaluated. Objective : To assess the value of FLASH scanning in the primary assessment of horses with colic in the field, using a portable wireless ultrasound system. Study design : Prospective study (2018–2021). Methods : Any horse examined for colic as an emergency in a first opinion ambulatory practice was eligible for inclusion in the study. A FLASH examination was performed using a wireless handheld ultrasound scanner, with the images displayed on a smartphone or tablet. The findings on FLASH scans and the outcome of the case (recovered, referred for surgery or euthanised without referral) were recorded. Results : In total, 135 equids with acute colic were evaluated. Of the 135 horses, 49 (36%) had an abnormal finding on FLASH scanning, including distended loops of small intestine ( n = 34), thickened small intestinal walls ( n = 23) and/or distension of the stomach ( n = 7). Reduced small intestinal motility was recorded in 52 animals (38%). Follow- up informa- tion was available in all animals: 50 (37%) were euthanised due to clinical deterioration and the owners ' decision not to undertake surgery; 85/135 (63%) survived, including 5/85 (6%) that underwent surgery and 80/85 (94%) that resolved with medical management. Main limitations : Small number of cases. Lack of results of post- mortem examination of horses that were euthanised. Potential selection bias. Conclusion : The FLASH technique can be valuable in the primary assessment of horses with colic in first opinion ambulatory practice. Further evaluation with more cases is required.


INTRODUCTION


Colic is the commonest emergency condition encountered ‘out of hours’


in first opinion equine practice (Bowden, Boynova,


et al., 2020 ). It is a leading cause of death and, as a result, it is eco- nomically important, not only to the horse industry but also to in- dividual horse owners. Colic is not a diagnosis but rather a clinical syndrome indicating abdominal pain for which there are multiple


Equine Vet Educ. 2024;36:571–578.


potential causes. Affected horses should be examined and treated promptly, not only for the welfare of the animal (Desrochers & White, 2017 ) but also to allow the early identification and treat- ment of serious life- threatening conditions, thereby improving the chances of a successful outcome. Whilst a definitive diagnosis of the cause of colic can be often difficult to establish, especially at the first examination, it is vital that those cases requiring surgical and/or intensive treatment are identified early, since rapid referral of horses


aaep.org/wiley-redirect © 2024 EVJ Ltd. | 571


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92